PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFVAX vs. SIEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Fixed Income Fund (CFVAX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFVAX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than SIEMX's 29.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CFVAX has underperformed SIEMX with an annualized return of 0.84%, while SIEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.


CFVAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.14%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
0.84%

SIEMX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.93%
YTD
29.32%
6M
32.48%
1Y
58.10%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Fixed Income Fund
0.28%6.89%-0.30%4.27%-15.80%-2.01%8.02%8.87%-0.82%3.33%
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
29.32%35.90%4.31%9.81%-21.51%-1.85%17.03%19.76%-18.67%37.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CFVAX and SIEMX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.02

The correlation between CFVAX and SIEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFVAX vs. SIEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFVAX
CFVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CFVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CFVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SIEMX
SIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Fixed Income Fund (CFVAX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFVAXSIEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.66

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.53

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

17.66

-12.94

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the SIEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFVAX and SIEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFVAXSIEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

3.49

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.45

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.58

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.29

-0.07

Drawdowns

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFVAX drawdown since its inception was -21.41%, smaller than the maximum SIEMX drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFVAX and SIEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFVAXSIEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.41%

-65.22%

+43.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-13.59%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.52%

-16.41%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.12%

-37.68%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.41%

-40.76%

+19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

0.00%

-8.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-21.45%

+15.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

3.42%

-2.35%

Volatility

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Fixed Income Fund (CFVAX) is 1.44%, while SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that CFVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFVAXSIEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

7.34%

-5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

14.85%

-11.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

17.66%

-13.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

16.67%

-10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

17.50%

-12.23%

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFVAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than SIEMX's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFVAX vs. SIEMX - Dividend Comparison

CFVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than SIEMX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Fixed Income Fund
3.80%3.73%2.63%1.62%1.41%1.70%3.91%2.97%2.42%1.66%0.33%0.00%
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.33%4.30%3.20%1.58%2.08%9.55%0.53%1.09%0.63%1.26%0.80%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFVAX and SIEMX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIEMX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to CFVAX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFVAX dropped -21.41% vs SIEMX's -65.22%.

SIEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFVAX and SIEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer