CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO
CFRN.TO (CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF) and RQO.TO (RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CFRN.TO returned 3.42%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for RQO.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFRN.TO achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than RQO.TO's 1.23% return.
CFRN.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
RQO.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 2.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFRN.TO CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.36% | 3.32% | 5.21% | 5.83% | 1.40% | 0.25% | 0.05% |
RQO.TO RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.23% | 3.57% | 5.40% | 6.86% | -7.50% | -2.27% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFRN.TO and RQO.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFRN.TO
RQO.TO
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF (CFRN.TO) and RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFRN.TO | RQO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.05 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.91 | 27.50 | -20.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.05 | 91.66 | -58.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFRN.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum RQO.TO drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFRN.TO and RQO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFRN.TO | RQO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -12.86% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.45% | -0.11% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.66% | -0.93% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.00% | -11.65% | +10.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.15% | -3.73% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.03% | +0.06% |
Volatility
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF (CFRN.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQO.TO) at 0.15%. This indicates that CFRN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFRN.TO | RQO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.15% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.83% | 0.47% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34% | 0.72% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.10% | 2.98% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.78% | 2.93% | -1.15% |
Dividends
CFRN.TO vs. RQO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFRN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than RQO.TO's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFRN.TO CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.17% | 3.47% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 2.26% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.70% |
RQO.TO RBC Target 2026 Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.03% | 2.66% | 2.56% | 1.98% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFRN.TO and RQO.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CIBC and RBC.
Find the right allocation for CFRN.TO and RQO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer