CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. CFOU.TO is passively managed, while ZLB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO returned 25.68%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for ZLB.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZLB.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 43.47% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO has outperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 25.68%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 14.74%
- YTD
- 43.47%
- 6M
- 42.96%
- 1Y
- 116.89%
- 3Y*
- 67.86%
- 5Y*
- 32.56%
- 10Y*
- 25.68%
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 43.47% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.72% | 40.48% | -21.69% | 22.51% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 6.82% | 20.40% | 15.31% | 9.41% | -0.35% | 22.93% | 1.51% | 21.92% | -2.76% | 11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFOU.TO
ZLB.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CFOU.TO
ZLB.TO
Basic Materials
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Communication Services
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Consumer Defensive
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Energy
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
-
Healthcare
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
-
Industrials
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Real Estate
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Technology
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Utilities
CFOU.TO
-
ZLB.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
ZLB.TO
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFOU.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.28 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.31 | 2.44 | +4.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.91 | 7.15 | +22.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -33.96% | -52.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -5.67% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | -8.01% | -16.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | -13.00% | -32.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.30% | -33.96% | -33.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -2.48% | -19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 1.93% | +1.99% |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 2.47% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | 7.69% | +13.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 9.29% | +15.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 9.63% | +17.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 12.22% | +21.60% |
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.86% | 1.99% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZLB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer