PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 43.47% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO has outperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 25.68%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.


CFOU.TO

1D
0.72%
1M
14.74%
YTD
43.47%
6M
42.96%
1Y
116.89%
3Y*
67.86%
5Y*
32.56%
10Y*
25.68%

ZLB.TO

1D
0.88%
1M
2.60%
YTD
6.82%
6M
2.65%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
43.47%69.17%56.15%18.37%-23.64%79.61%-14.72%40.48%-21.69%22.51%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
6.82%20.40%15.31%9.41%-0.35%22.93%1.51%21.92%-2.76%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011

0.63

The correlation between CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CFOU.TO
ZLB.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
24.4%

Basic Materials

-

6.1%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

18.2%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

9.4%

Real Estate

-

4.2%

Technology

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

17.6%

Financial Services

CFOU.TO
100.0%
ZLB.TO
24.4%

Basic Materials

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
6.1%

Communication Services

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
18.2%

Energy

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO

-

Healthcare

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO

-

Industrials

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
9.4%

Real Estate

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
4.2%

Technology

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
1.9%

Utilities

CFOU.TO

-

ZLB.TO
17.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFOU.TOZLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.28

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.31

2.44

+4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.91

7.15

+22.76

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.69, which is higher than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFOU.TOZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.23%

-33.96%

-52.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.08%

-5.67%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-8.01%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.23%

-13.00%

-32.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.30%

-33.96%

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-2.48%

-19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

1.93%

+1.99%

Volatility

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFOU.TOZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

2.47%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

7.69%

+13.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

9.29%

+15.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.61%

9.63%

+17.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.82%

12.22%

+21.60%

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFOU.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
1.86%1.99%2.37%2.67%2.66%2.39%2.83%2.44%2.76%2.55%2.94%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZLB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and ZLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer