CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and XEN.TO (iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while XEN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO returned 23.35%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for XEN.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for XEN.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than XEN.TO's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO has outperformed XEN.TO with an annualized return of 23.35%, while XEN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
XEN.TO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 35.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.75% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 40.45% | -21.67% | 22.44% |
XEN.TO iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF | 10.45% | 34.17% | 16.91% | 12.18% | -3.37% | 28.00% | -0.30% | 17.34% | -7.93% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and XEN.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CFOU.TO and XEN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFOU.TO
XEN.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CFOU.TO
XEN.TO
Basic Materials
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Communication Services
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Consumer Defensive
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Energy
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Healthcare
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
-
Industrials
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Real Estate
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Technology
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Utilities
CFOU.TO
-
XEN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
XEN.TO
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFOU.TO | XEN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.54 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 4.19 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | 18.92 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFOU.TO | XEN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 2.91 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.82 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than XEN.TO's maximum drawdown of -49.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and XEN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | XEN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -49.69% | -36.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -8.55% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | -13.31% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | -17.79% | -27.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -36.24% | -31.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -7.65% | -14.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 1.89% | +2.04% |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) at 2.53%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | XEN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 2.53% | +6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.17% | 9.88% | +11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.93% | 12.31% | +12.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 13.91% | +13.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 15.07% | +18.79% |
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XEN.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. XEN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEN.TO iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF | 1.67% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 1.73% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 2.31% | 1.75% | 2.07% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and XEN.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEN.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEN.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XEN.TO is Canada Equities. CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while XEN.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.55% for XEN.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and XEN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer