CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and XCG.TO (iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while XCG.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO returned 23.35%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for XCG.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for XCG.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than XCG.TO's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO has outperformed XCG.TO with an annualized return of 23.35%, while XCG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
XCG.TO
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.75% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 40.45% | -21.67% | 22.44% |
XCG.TO iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF | 2.86% | 9.37% | 21.40% | 17.43% | -11.67% | 15.98% | 11.25% | 28.29% | -6.14% | 7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and XCG.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CFOU.TO and XCG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFOU.TO
XCG.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CFOU.TO
XCG.TO
Basic Materials
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Communication Services
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Consumer Defensive
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Energy
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Healthcare
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
-
Industrials
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Real Estate
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Technology
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
Utilities
CFOU.TO
-
XCG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
XCG.TO
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF (XCG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFOU.TO | XCG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.07 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 0.39 | +5.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | 1.12 | +23.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFOU.TO | XCG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 0.30 | +3.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.53 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.58 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.37 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than XCG.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and XCG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | XCG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -52.64% | -33.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -15.27% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | -15.27% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | -21.61% | -23.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -32.14% | -35.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.45% | +6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -10.87% | -11.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 5.26% | -1.33% |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF (XCG.TO) at 5.11%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | XCG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 5.11% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.17% | 17.02% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.93% | 20.07% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 15.88% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 16.48% | +17.38% |
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XCG.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. XCG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCG.TO iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.60% | 1.33% | 1.59% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.53% | 1.65% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and XCG.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCG.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCG.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XCG.TO is Canada Equities. CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while XCG.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.55% for XCG.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and XCG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer