CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and QQQL.TO (Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while QQQL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CFOU.TO returned 96.97% vs 54.14% for QQQL.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQL.TO.

Performance

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than QQQL.TO's 26.16% return.

CFOU.TO

• 1D: 3.68%
• 1M: 12.30%
• YTD: 27.75%
• 6M: 35.24%
• 1Y: 96.97%
• 3Y*: 59.80%
• 5Y*: 29.38%
• 10Y*: 23.35%

QQQL.TO

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 14.34%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 22.04%
• 1Y: 54.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF	27.75%	69.17%	41.47%
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF	26.16%	16.16%	24.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CFOU.TO and QQQL.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024	0.32

Return for Risk

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFOU.TO

CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QQQL.TO

QQQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QQQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QQQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QQQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QQQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFOU.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.91	2.86	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.68	3.80	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.65	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.06	4.29	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.79	11.30	+13.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is higher than the QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFOU.TO and QQQL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFOU.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91	2.86	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	1.33	-1.00

Drawdowns

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than QQQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and QQQL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFOU.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.23%	-27.82%	-58.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.08%	-12.69%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.84%	+1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.46%	-4.87%	-17.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	4.80%	-0.87%

Volatility

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) at 6.13%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFOU.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.75%	6.13%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.17%	14.00%	+7.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.93%	18.99%	+5.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.61%	25.73%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.86%	25.73%	+8.13%

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQL.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFOU.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CFOU.TO nor QQQL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFOU.TO and QQQL.TO in my portfolio?

CFOU.TO and QQQL.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CFOU.TO or QQQL.TO?

On fees, QQQL.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFOU.TO or QQQL.TO?

QQQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

What is the main difference between CFOU.TO and QQQL.TO?

CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQL.TO is Nasdaq-100. CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while QQQL.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.49% for QQQL.TO.