CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO returned 23.35%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for HXS.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HXS.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than HXS.TO's 12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CFOU.TO has outperformed HXS.TO with an annualized return of 23.35%, while HXS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.01% annualized return.
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
HXS.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.75% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 40.45% | -21.67% | 22.44% |
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 12.45% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 15.78% | 24.69% | 3.03% | 13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and HXS.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CFOU.TO and HXS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFOU.TO
HXS.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CFOU.TO
HXS.TO
Basic Materials
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Communication Services
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Consumer Defensive
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Energy
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Healthcare
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Industrials
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Real Estate
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Technology
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Utilities
CFOU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
HXS.TO
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.46 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 3.42 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | 12.97 | +11.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 2.53 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.97 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.02 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than HXS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and HXS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -27.42% | -58.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -8.74% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | -18.98% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | -22.63% | -22.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | -27.42% | -39.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -3.54% | -18.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.30% | +1.63% |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) at 3.21%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 3.21% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.17% | 8.84% | +12.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.93% | 11.84% | +13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 15.13% | +12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 16.52% | +17.34% |
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CFOU.TO nor HXS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HXS.TO is S&P 500. CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and HXS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer