CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while FCCQ.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CFOU.TO returned 29.38%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for FCCQ.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCQ.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than FCCQ.TO's 6.62% return.
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.75% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 22.47% |
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 6.62% | 31.01% | 21.58% | 11.02% | -7.52% | 22.24% | 2.30% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and FCCQ.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CFOU.TO and FCCQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFOU.TO
FCCQ.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CFOU.TO
FCCQ.TO
Basic Materials
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Communication Services
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Energy
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Healthcare
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Industrials
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Real Estate
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Technology
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
Utilities
CFOU.TO
-
FCCQ.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
FCCQ.TO
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFOU.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.39 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 2.78 | +3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | 11.87 | +12.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFOU.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 2.17 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.80 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than FCCQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and FCCQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -35.31% | -50.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -11.29% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | -13.41% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | -17.97% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.68% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -3.99% | -18.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.64% | +1.29% |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) at 4.12%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 4.12% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.17% | 12.07% | +9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.93% | 14.47% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 13.72% | +13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 16.05% | +17.81% |
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.47% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and FCCQ.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FCCQ.TO is Canada Equities. CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while FCCQ.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and FCCQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer