CFMSX vs. VMCIX
CFMSX (Column Mid Cap Select Fund) and VMCIX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, CFMSX returned 14.75% vs 18.75% for VMCIX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFMSX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VMCIX.
Performance
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFMSX achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than VMCIX's 10.56% return.
CFMSX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VMCIX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CFMSX Column Mid Cap Select Fund | 6.29% | 7.77% | -3.71% |
VMCIX Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares | 10.56% | 11.67% | -3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFMSX and VMCIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CFMSX and VMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFMSX vs. VMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
CFMSX
VMCIX
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFMSX | VMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.62 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 2.31 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.45 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 9.29 | -3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFMSX | VMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.62 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFMSX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, smaller than the maximum VMCIX drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFMSX and VMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFMSX | VMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -58.86% | +40.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -8.13% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | 0.00% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -7.97% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.14% | +0.45% |
Volatility
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMCIX) at 2.97%. This indicates that CFMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFMSX | VMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 2.97% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 9.29% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 12.31% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 17.63% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 18.92% | -1.47% |
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFMSX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VMCIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFMSX vs. VMCIX - Dividend Comparison
CFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than VMCIX's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFMSX Column Mid Cap Select Fund | 1.99% | 2.12% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMCIX Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.51% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.83% | 1.36% | 1.46% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CFMSX and VMCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CFMSX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to VMCIX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFMSX dropped -18.02% vs VMCIX's -58.86%.
VMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFMSX and VMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer