PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFMSX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFMSX achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 1.92% return.


CFMSX

1D
0.80%
1M
0.80%
YTD
7.14%
6M
6.83%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTMFX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.74%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CFMSX
Column Mid Cap Select Fund
7.14%7.77%-3.71%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
1.92%4.29%-3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CFMSX and BTMFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

0.93

The correlation between CFMSX and BTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFMSX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFMSX
CFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFMSXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.10

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.84

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

2.35

+3.71

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFMSX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFMSXBTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.56

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.48

-0.04

Drawdowns

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFMSX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, smaller than the maximum BTMFX drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFMSX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFMSXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-49.26%

+31.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-7.79%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-2.54%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-6.16%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.80%

-0.21%

Volatility

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) at 2.88%. This indicates that CFMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFMSXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.88%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

7.99%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

11.80%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

15.75%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

17.44%

-0.01%

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFMSX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFMSX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

CFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than BTMFX's 10.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.66%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
CFMSX
Column Mid Cap Select Fund
1.98%2.12%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CFMSX and BTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CFMSX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to BTMFX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFMSX dropped -18.02% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

CFMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFMSX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer