CFMSX vs. ATGAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CFMSX (Column Mid Cap Select Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CFMSX charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.

Performance

CFMSX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CFMSX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 7.14%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 14.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ATGAX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFMSX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CFMSX Column Mid Cap Select Fund	0.40%
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CFMSX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

CFMSX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFMSX

CFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 19
CFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFMSX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFMSX	ATGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.05	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFMSX	ATGAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	58.33	-57.90

Drawdowns

CFMSX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFMSX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFMSX and ATGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFMSX	ATGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	0.00%	-18.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	0.00%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	0.00%	-3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CFMSX	ATGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.66%	9.26%	+4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	9.26%	+8.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	9.26%	+8.17%

CFMSX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFMSX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFMSX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

CFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CFMSX Column Mid Cap Select Fund	1.98%	2.12%	0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFMSX and ATGAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, CFMSX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.