CFMOX vs. DFABX
CFMOX (Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund) and DFABX (DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, CFMOX returned 3.41%/yr vs 2.82%/yr for DFABX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CFMOX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DFABX.
Performance
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CFMOX having a 0.99% return and DFABX slightly lower at 0.98%.
CFMOX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
DFABX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 0.99% | 5.33% | 0.38% | 4.87% | -0.83% |
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.98% | 2.46% | 2.90% | 2.87% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFMOX and DFABX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2022 | 0.42 |
The correlation between CFMOX and DFABX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFMOX vs. DFABX — Risk / Return Rank
CFMOX
DFABX
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) and DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFMOX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 6.47 | -4.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 24.96 | -22.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 107.63 | -100.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFMOX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 4.77 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 2.48 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFMOX drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, which is greater than DFABX's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFMOX and DFABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFMOX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -2.46% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -0.11% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.96% | -0.60% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | 0.00% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -0.24% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.02% | +0.83% |
Volatility
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Volatility Comparison
Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX) at 0.20%. This indicates that CFMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFMOX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.20% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.82% | 0.42% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 0.56% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 0.96% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 0.96% | +2.37% |
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFMOX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than DFABX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFMOX vs. DFABX - Dividend Comparison
CFMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, which matches DFABX's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.61% | 3.41% | 2.16% | 2.11% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 2.44% | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.43% |
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.63% | 2.33% | 2.86% | 2.52% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFMOX and DFABX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFMOX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to DFABX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFMOX dropped -12.14% vs DFABX's -2.46%.
DFABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFMOX and DFABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer