CFJIX vs. YAFFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CFJIX (Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund) and YAFFX (AMG Yacktman Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CFJIX returned 12.26%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for YAFFX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CFJIX charges 0.24%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for YAFFX.

Performance

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CFJIX having a 23.32% return and YAFFX slightly higher at 24.36%. Over the past 10 years, CFJIX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 12.26%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.

CFJIX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: 18.52%
• YTD: 23.32%
• 1Y: 37.23%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 11.16%
• 10Y*: 12.26%
• ALL TIME*: 12.45%

YAFFX

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 2.89%
• 6M: 12.11%
• YTD: 24.36%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 17.52%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: 12.96%
• ALL TIME*: 10.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CFJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund	23.32%	16.76%	14.63%	9.86%	-11.70%	24.40%	9.06%	29.36%	-10.08%	15.17%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	24.36%	23.70%	0.63%	16.53%	-8.20%	16.48%	17.22%	19.21%	2.99%	20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CFJIX and YAFFX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between CFJIX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CFJIX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CFJIX

CFJIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CFJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CFJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CFJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CFJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CFJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

YAFFX

YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 89
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFJIX	YAFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.37	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	2.98	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.44	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	4.38	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	10.92	+4.43

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFJIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFJIX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFJIX drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, smaller than the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFJIX and YAFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFJIX	YAFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.91%	-43.80%	+6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-8.76%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	-15.63%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.62%	-21.31%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.91%	-30.62%	-6.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-5.35%	+3.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-6.09%	+1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	3.51%	-1.27%

Volatility

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) is 3.46%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that CFJIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFJIX	YAFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	4.34%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	14.23%	-4.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	16.20%	-3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	13.93%	+2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	14.34%	+3.60%

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFJIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFJIX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

CFJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than YAFFX's 14.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund	7.43%	9.16%	6.31%	2.07%	2.02%	4.17%	1.88%	2.17%	4.87%	6.79%	2.28%	0.00%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	14.92%	18.55%	10.20%	4.42%	7.60%	4.70%	11.87%	15.84%	22.15%	11.82%	11.81%	24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFJIX and YAFFX in my portfolio?

CFJIX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFJIX or YAFFX?

YAFFX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to CFJIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFJIX dropped -36.91% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.