CFIMX vs. NWAUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clipper Fund (CFIMX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX).
CFIMX is managed by Clipper Fund. It was launched on Feb 29, 1984. NWAUX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Jan 24, 2021.
Performance
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIMX Clipper Fund | -3.84% | 27.39% | 19.40% | 31.59% | -18.80% | 6.56% |
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund | 9.70% | -4.92% | 27.90% | 18.30% | -3.23% | 22.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIMX achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.70% return.
CFIMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
NWAUX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFIMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFIMX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank
CFIMX
NWAUX
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clipper Fund (CFIMX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFIMX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.49 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 0.73 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.58 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 1.36 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFIMX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.49 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.83 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIMX and NWAUX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison
CFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than NWAUX's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIMX Clipper Fund | 8.64% | 8.31% | 13.43% | 6.10% | 5.67% | 13.79% | 2.45% | 1.46% | 10.12% | 5.95% | 10.43% | 0.71% |
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund | 4.69% | 4.35% | 13.58% | 0.40% | 1.93% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIMX drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIMX and NWAUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIMX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -21.07% | -45.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -8.87% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.80% | -21.07% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -7.03% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -6.85% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.83% | -1.11% |
Volatility
CFIMX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison
Clipper Fund (CFIMX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that CFIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFIMX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 2.74% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 7.29% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 12.58% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 16.10% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 16.05% | +3.58% |