PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFIHX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIHX achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than CONWX's 5.63% return.


CFIHX

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.10%
YTD
7.57%
6M
8.60%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*

CONWX

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
5.63%
6M
5.85%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFIHX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3
7.57%20.76%9.78%9.31%-6.86%15.39%3.52%17.60%-6.77%13.12%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
5.63%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIHX and CONWX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between CFIHX and CONWX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFIHX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIHX
CFIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CFIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFIHXCONWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.17

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

9.50

+1.63

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIHX and CONWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIHX drawdown since its inception was -25.26%, roughly equal to the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIHX and CONWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFIHXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-26.09%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-4.34%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.88%

-9.86%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.45%

-12.49%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-4.34%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-2.78%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.45%

+0.17%

Volatility

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 1.97%. This indicates that CFIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFIHXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

1.97%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

5.32%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.27%

7.12%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.04%

10.21%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.97%

11.10%

-0.13%

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFIHX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

CFIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than CONWX's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFIHX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3
7.61%8.03%5.35%3.79%3.77%3.46%3.70%4.41%4.11%4.74%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.49%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFIHX and CONWX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFIHX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to CONWX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIHX dropped -25.26% vs CONWX's -26.09%.

CFIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFIHX and CONWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer