CFAGX vs. RIPIX
CFAGX (Commerce MidCap Growth Fund) and RIPIX (Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CFAGX returned 3.57%/yr vs -4.52%/yr for RIPIX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFAGX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RIPIX.
Performance
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFAGX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than RIPIX's -0.96% return.
CFAGX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- -0.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
RIPIX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- -4.68%
- 3Y*
- 1.63%
- 5Y*
- -4.52%
- 10Y*
- —
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAGX Commerce MidCap Growth Fund | 2.86% | 1.58% | 11.77% | 17.74% | -20.31% | 19.12% | 23.78% | 34.41% | -6.68% |
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | -0.96% | 9.89% | -7.04% | 8.14% | -26.99% | 6.22% | 16.11% | 34.69% | -12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFAGX and RIPIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between CFAGX and RIPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFAGX vs. RIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
CFAGX
RIPIX
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) and Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFAGX | RIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | -0.22 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | -0.52 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.05%, which is greater than RIPIX's maximum drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFAGX and RIPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFAGX | RIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.05% | -41.89% | -19.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.87% | -16.38% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -17.28% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -41.89% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -27.00% | +23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -18.05% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 6.85% | -1.95% |
Volatility
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Volatility Comparison
Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) at 4.15%. This indicates that CFAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFAGX | RIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 4.15% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 11.14% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 13.32% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 15.47% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 16.15% | +2.32% |
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFAGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than RIPIX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFAGX vs. RIPIX - Dividend Comparison
CFAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.20%, more than RIPIX's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAGX Commerce MidCap Growth Fund | 24.20% | 24.89% | 10.80% | 6.77% | 2.00% | 19.35% | 4.23% | 6.59% | 10.81% | 7.05% | 5.27% | 8.83% |
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 1.47% | 1.46% | 5.66% | 3.09% | 3.87% | 5.02% | 0.36% | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFAGX and RIPIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFAGX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to RIPIX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFAGX dropped -61.05% vs RIPIX's -41.89%.
CFAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFAGX and RIPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer