PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFAGX vs. BARIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) and Baron Asset Fund Institutional Class (BARIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFAGX achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than BARIX's 4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CFAGX has underperformed BARIX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while BARIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


CFAGX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.89%
YTD
3.91%
6M
1.99%
1Y
2.14%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
10.68%

BARIX

1D
-6.28%
1M
10.34%
YTD
4.14%
6M
3.09%
1Y
8.85%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFAGX
Commerce MidCap Growth Fund
3.91%1.58%11.77%17.74%-20.31%19.12%23.78%34.41%-4.55%23.39%
BARIX
Baron Asset Fund Institutional Class
4.14%8.17%10.64%17.36%-25.87%14.17%33.32%37.98%0.13%26.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CFAGX and BARIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2009

0.93

The correlation between CFAGX and BARIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFAGX vs. BARIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFAGX
CFAGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CFAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CFAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BARIX
BARIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BARIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BARIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BARIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BARIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BARIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) and Baron Asset Fund Institutional Class (BARIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFAGXBARIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.92

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

1.89

-1.23

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BARIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFAGX and BARIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.05%, which is greater than BARIX's maximum drawdown of -37.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFAGX and BARIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFAGXBARIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.05%

-37.44%

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-10.68%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-17.78%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-37.44%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.23%

-37.44%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-9.91%

+7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-6.73%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

5.20%

-0.31%

Volatility

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) is 4.71%, while Baron Asset Fund Institutional Class (BARIX) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that CFAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BARIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFAGXBARIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

13.52%

-8.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

15.74%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

19.84%

-5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

20.42%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

20.27%

-1.77%

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFAGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BARIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFAGX vs. BARIX - Dividend Comparison

CFAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.95%, more than BARIX's 10.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BARIX
Baron Asset Fund Institutional Class
10.16%10.59%17.88%3.28%0.01%7.26%2.92%1.70%7.14%7.01%4.74%11.23%
CFAGX
Commerce MidCap Growth Fund
23.95%24.89%10.80%6.77%2.00%19.35%4.23%6.59%10.81%7.05%5.27%8.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFAGX and BARIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BARIX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to CFAGX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFAGX dropped -61.05% vs BARIX's -37.44%.

BARIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFAGX and BARIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer