CEW vs. FXF
CEW (WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund) and FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) are both Currency funds. CEW is actively managed, while FXF is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEW returned 2.54%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for FXF. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEW charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FXF.
Performance
CEW vs. FXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEW achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CEW has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 2.54%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.25% annualized return.
CEW
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- 8.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
FXF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
CEW vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund | 2.70% | 14.48% | -0.99% | 9.06% | -1.65% | -6.62% | -0.04% | 4.78% | -5.09% | 11.09% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.20% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEW and FXF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2009 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CEW and FXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEW vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank
CEW
FXF
CEW vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.47 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.77 | +1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 0.72 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 1.62 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.47 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.24 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.17 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CEW vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEW drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, smaller than the maximum FXF drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEW and FXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.89% | -35.58% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.85% | -4.82% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.28% | -8.52% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -13.03% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.72% | -15.04% | -2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -18.53% | +17.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -20.84% | +7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 2.15% | -1.01% |
Volatility
CEW vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) have volatilities of 1.65% and 1.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEW | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 1.69% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.04% | 5.56% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 7.51% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 8.32% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 7.57% | -0.54% |
CEW vs. FXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEW vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison
CEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund | 2.41% | 2.47% | 5.42% | 2.00% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 1.87% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEW and FXF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXF has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to CEW (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEW dropped -27.89% vs FXF's -35.58%.
On 10-year performance, CEW leads with 2.54% vs 1.25% for FXF. On fees, FXF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CEW has performed better with a 2.54% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CEW.
CEW has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEW and 0.40% for FXF.
CEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEW and FXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer