CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L
CEUG.L (iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and PRIZ.L (Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - CEUG.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while PRIZ.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEUG.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for PRIZ.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEUG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIZ.L.
Performance
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEUG.L is traded in GBP, while PRIZ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIZ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEUG.L achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than PRIZ.L's 8.21% return.
CEUG.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 20.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- —
PRIZ.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEUG.L iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 9.89% | 26.75% | 10.82% | 20.52% | -10.51% | 22.89% | -0.23% | 5.33% |
PRIZ.L Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) | 8.21% | 28.03% | 1.78% | 13.31% | -9.02% | 14.24% | 0.24% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEUG.L and PRIZ.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CEUG.L and PRIZ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Industrials
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Technology
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Consumer Cyclical
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Utilities
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Healthcare
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Consumer Defensive
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Energy
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Basic Materials
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Communication Services
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Real Estate
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEUG.L
PRIZ.L
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEUG.L | PRIZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.47 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 7.96 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEUG.L | PRIZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.59 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.67 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.52 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEUG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.52%, which is greater than PRIZ.L's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.L and PRIZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEUG.L | PRIZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.52% | -33.71% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -10.90% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | -12.94% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -22.82% | -1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.09% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -6.03% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.59% | -0.89% |
Volatility
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIZ.L) at 4.56%. This indicates that CEUG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRIZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEUG.L | PRIZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.56% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 12.91% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 16.93% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 21.48% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 24.31% | -6.27% |
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEUG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEUG.L vs. PRIZ.L - Dividend Comparison
CEUG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than PRIZ.L's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEUG.L iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.35% | 2.53% | 2.80% | 2.73% | 2.84% | 1.81% | 1.77% | 3.05% | 0.38% |
PRIZ.L Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEUG.L and PRIZ.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRIZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CEUG.L.
CEUG.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while PRIZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEUG.L and 0.05% for PRIZ.L.
Find the right allocation for CEUG.L and PRIZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer