PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEU2.L is traded in USD, while JRDZ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDZ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


CEU2.L

1D
-1.01%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
5.49%
6M
8.57%
1Y
16.45%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*

JRDZ.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEU2.L
CEU2.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CEU2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDZ.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU2.LJRDZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEU2.LJRDZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEU2.LJRDZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

Volatility

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEU2.LJRDZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEU2.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDZ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEU2.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEU2.L nor JRDZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CEU2.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEU2.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

CEU2.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while JRDZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU2.L and 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU2.L and JRDZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer