PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEU2.L is traded in USD, while CEUR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CEUR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEU2.L achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than CEUR.L's 5.17% return.


CEU2.L

1D
-1.01%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
5.49%
6M
8.57%
1Y
16.45%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*

CEUR.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.48%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
6.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CEU2.L
Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR
5.49%34.96%2.14%19.74%-14.16%16.28%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
5.17%33.86%3.15%18.89%-16.01%16.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CEU2.L and CEUR.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021

0.93

The correlation between CEU2.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEU2.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

23.5%
25.1%

Industrials

20.1%
19.8%

Healthcare

13.3%
13.8%

Technology

8.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.2%

Energy

5.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.8%

Utilities

4.8%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

CEU2.L
23.5%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

CEU2.L
20.1%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Healthcare

CEU2.L
13.3%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Technology

CEU2.L
8.7%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

CEU2.L
8.3%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CEU2.L
6.4%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Energy

CEU2.L
5.4%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

CEU2.L
5.0%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Utilities

CEU2.L
4.8%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Communication Services

CEU2.L
3.7%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

CEU2.L
0.8%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEU2.L
CEU2.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CEU2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU2.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

4.73

+0.35

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU2.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU2.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEU2.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.10

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.46

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.22

+0.41

Drawdowns

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU2.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, smaller than the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -56.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU2.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEU2.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.85%

-56.89%

+26.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-12.32%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-14.20%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-32.57%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-3.07%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-14.05%

+8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.49%

-0.26%

Volatility

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that CEU2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEU2.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.10%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

12.26%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

14.90%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.48%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

18.99%

-1.78%

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEU2.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEU2.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEU2.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CEU2.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CEU2.L.

CEU2.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU2.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU2.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer