PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEU1.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


CEU1.L

1D
0.41%
1M
4.87%
YTD
7.95%
6M
9.61%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.08%

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.94%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CEU1.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.95%30.63%4.62%16.50%-6.40%4.60%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CEU1.L and LDEG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.75

The correlation between CEU1.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEU1.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

24.0%
41.5%

Industrials

21.0%
15.8%

Technology

15.9%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
3.3%

Utilities

6.4%
8.2%

Healthcare

5.6%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.3%
5.2%

Basic Materials

4.0%
9.9%

Energy

3.9%
7.7%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

CEU1.L
24.0%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Industrials

CEU1.L
21.0%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Technology

CEU1.L
15.9%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CEU1.L
8.4%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Utilities

CEU1.L
6.4%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Healthcare

CEU1.L
5.6%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

CEU1.L
5.6%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Communication Services

CEU1.L
4.3%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

CEU1.L
4.0%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Energy

CEU1.L
3.9%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Real Estate

CEU1.L
0.9%
LDEG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEU1.L
CEU1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU1.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.48

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.78

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

13.82

-7.04

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU1.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEU1.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.63

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.24

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.24

-0.73

Drawdowns

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU1.L drawdown since its inception was -31.47%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU1.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEU1.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.47%

-15.97%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-8.04%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-12.05%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.68%

-15.97%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.33%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-2.95%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.20%

+0.90%

Volatility

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that CEU1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEU1.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

3.57%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

9.21%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

11.55%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.99%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.01%

+0.76%

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEU1.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEU1.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

CEU1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CEU1.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEU1.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEU1.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEU1.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

CEU1.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU1.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU1.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer