PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEU1.L having a 7.95% return and JRDZ.L slightly higher at 8.20%.


CEU1.L

1D
0.41%
1M
4.87%
YTD
7.95%
6M
9.61%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.08%

JRDZ.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.70%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.44%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEU1.L and JRDZ.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.29

The correlation between CEU1.L and JRDZ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEU1.L
CEU1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDZ.L
JRDZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU1.LJRDZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.16

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

32.94

-31.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

83.74

-76.96

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU1.L and JRDZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEU1.LJRDZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

6.59

-5.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

7.14

-6.63

Drawdowns

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU1.L drawdown since its inception was -31.47%, which is greater than JRDZ.L's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU1.L and JRDZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEU1.LJRDZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.47%

-4.00%

-27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-4.00%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.05%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-1.05%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

Volatility

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L) have volatilities of 4.55% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEU1.LJRDZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.56%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

20.18%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

23.37%

-7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

23.37%

-6.60%

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEU1.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDZ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEU1.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

CEU1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CEU1.L and JRDZ.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEU1.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEU1.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU1.L and 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU1.L and JRDZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer