CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE
CETH.DE (CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)) and WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - CETH.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while WEBN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. CETH.DE is actively managed, while WEBN.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, CETH.DE returned -33.29% vs 26.84% for WEBN.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CETH.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBN.DE.
Performance
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CETH.DE achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 12.37% return.
CETH.DE
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -24.82%
- YTD
- -39.33%
- 6M
- -43.83%
- 1Y
- -33.29%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 26.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CETH.DE CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) | -39.33% | -21.13% | 4.50% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 12.37% | 9.70% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CETH.DE and WEBN.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CETH.DE
WEBN.DE
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CETH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.41 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 4.03 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 16.67 | -17.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CETH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.28 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.08 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETH.DE and WEBN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CETH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -21.22% | -55.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.38% | -6.63% | -54.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.93% | -0.65% | -62.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -3.11% | -39.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.18% | 1.61% | +34.57% |
Volatility
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) at 3.05%. This indicates that CETH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CETH.DE | WEBN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 3.05% | +7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.06% | 8.43% | +33.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.59% | 11.74% | +47.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 14.90% | +52.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 14.90% | +52.76% |
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CETH.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CETH.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CETH.DE nor WEBN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CETH.DE and WEBN.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CETH.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CETH.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for WEBN.DE.
CETH.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while WEBN.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CETH.DE and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.
Find the right allocation for CETH.DE and WEBN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer