CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CETH.DE (CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CETH.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. CETH.DE is actively managed, while LSMC.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CETH.DE returned -3.03%/yr vs 62.06%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CETH.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.

Performance

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CETH.DE achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.

CETH.DE

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -24.82%
• YTD: -39.33%
• 6M: -43.83%
• 1Y: -33.29%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSMC.DE

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 16.45%
• YTD: 63.83%
• 6M: 64.57%
• 1Y: 130.64%
• 3Y*: 62.06%
• 5Y*: 36.20%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CETH.DE CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)	-39.33%	-21.13%	53.89%	91.46%	-66.40%	43.27%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	63.83%	32.60%	66.54%	74.46%	-34.66%	14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CETH.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2021	0.34

The correlation between CETH.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CETH.DE

CETH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5
CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CETH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CETH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CETH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CETH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CETH.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	4.27	-4.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	4.60	-5.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.59	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	10.37	-10.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	32.83	-33.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CETH.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CETH.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	4.27	-4.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.82	-0.93

Drawdowns

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETH.DE and LSMC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CETH.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-39.77%	-36.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.38%	-12.53%	-48.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.55%	-36.22%	-28.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.93%	-3.34%	-59.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.92%	-9.37%	-33.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.18%	3.96%	+32.22%

Volatility

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) is 10.13%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that CETH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CETH.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.13%	11.23%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.06%	22.18%	+19.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.59%	30.40%	+29.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.66%	31.21%	+36.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.66%	26.06%	+41.60%

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CETH.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CETH.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CETH.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CETH.DE and LSMC.DE in my portfolio?

CETH.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CETH.DE or LSMC.DE?

On fees, CETH.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CETH.DE or LSMC.DE?

CETH.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

What is the main difference between CETH.DE and LSMC.DE?

CETH.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CETH.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.