CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE
CETH.DE (CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)) and IUSN.DE (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CETH.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while IUSN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap. CETH.DE is actively managed, while IUSN.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CETH.DE returned -3.03%/yr vs 14.95%/yr for IUSN.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CETH.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IUSN.DE.
Performance
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CETH.DE achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than IUSN.DE's 14.82% return.
CETH.DE
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -24.82%
- YTD
- -39.33%
- 6M
- -43.83%
- 1Y
- -33.29%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSN.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 14.82%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 30.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CETH.DE CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) | -39.33% | -21.13% | 53.89% | 91.46% | -66.40% | 43.27% |
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 14.82% | 7.82% | 13.17% | 13.11% | -13.82% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CETH.DE and IUSN.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2021 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CETH.DE
IUSN.DE
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CETH.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 4.20 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 15.62 | -16.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CETH.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.19 | -2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.53 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than IUSN.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETH.DE and IUSN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CETH.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -40.23% | -36.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.38% | -7.12% | -54.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.55% | -24.32% | -40.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.93% | 0.00% | -62.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -7.03% | -35.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.18% | 1.92% | +34.26% |
Volatility
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) at 3.46%. This indicates that CETH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CETH.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 3.46% | +6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.06% | 9.56% | +32.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.59% | 13.64% | +45.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 16.53% | +51.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 18.31% | +49.35% |
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CETH.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CETH.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CETH.DE nor IUSN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CETH.DE and IUSN.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CETH.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CETH.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
CETH.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IUSN.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CETH.DE and 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
Find the right allocation for CETH.DE and IUSN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer