PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CETH.DE achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than DAVV.DE's 27.16% return.


CETH.DE

1D
-3.68%
1M
-24.82%
YTD
-39.33%
6M
-43.83%
1Y
-33.29%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
10Y*

DAVV.DE

1D
-3.80%
1M
6.15%
YTD
27.16%
6M
10.24%
1Y
47.23%
3Y*
52.28%
5Y*
-1.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CETH.DE
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
-39.33%-21.13%53.89%91.46%-66.40%43.27%
DAVV.DE
VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF
27.16%-0.68%37.42%337.08%-85.83%-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CETH.DE and DAVV.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2021

0.66

The correlation between CETH.DE and DAVV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CETH.DE
CETH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DAVV.DE
DAVV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DAVV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAVV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CETH.DEDAVV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.16

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.03

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

1.90

-2.82

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the DAVV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CETH.DE and DAVV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CETH.DEDAVV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

0.81

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.05

-0.06

Drawdowns

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum DAVV.DE drawdown of -91.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETH.DE and DAVV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CETH.DEDAVV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-91.53%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.38%

-45.68%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.55%

-60.00%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.93%

-34.58%

-28.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-57.66%

+14.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.18%

24.79%

+11.39%

Volatility

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) is 10.13%, while VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that CETH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAVV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CETH.DEDAVV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

14.56%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.06%

40.57%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

58.12%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.66%

70.78%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.66%

70.57%

-2.91%

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CETH.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DAVV.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CETH.DE vs. DAVV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CETH.DE nor DAVV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CETH.DE and DAVV.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CETH.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CETH.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DAVV.DE.

CETH.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DAVV.DE is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CETH.DE and 0.65% for DAVV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CETH.DE and DAVV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer