CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE
CETH.DE (CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)) and 2B7A.DE (iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CETH.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while 2B7A.DE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities. CETH.DE is actively managed, while 2B7A.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CETH.DE returned -3.03%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for 2B7A.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CETH.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7A.DE.
Performance
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CETH.DE achieves a -39.33% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7A.DE's 3.01% return.
CETH.DE
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -24.82%
- YTD
- -39.33%
- 6M
- -43.83%
- 1Y
- -33.29%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B7A.DE
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 6.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- —
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CETH.DE CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) | -39.33% | -21.13% | 53.89% | 91.46% | -66.40% | 43.27% |
2B7A.DE iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 3.01% | 2.79% | 29.83% | -11.29% | 8.44% | 19.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CETH.DE and 2B7A.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CETH.DE
2B7A.DE
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CETH.DE | 2B7A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.72 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 1.49 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CETH.DE | 2B7A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 0.45 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.43 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than 2B7A.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETH.DE and 2B7A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CETH.DE | 2B7A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -35.70% | -41.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.38% | -9.22% | -52.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.55% | -16.84% | -47.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.93% | -8.77% | -54.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -10.03% | -32.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.18% | 4.48% | +31.70% |
Volatility
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) at 5.01%. This indicates that CETH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CETH.DE | 2B7A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 5.01% | +5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.06% | 12.01% | +30.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.59% | 14.74% | +44.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 17.01% | +50.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 19.65% | +48.01% |
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CETH.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7A.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CETH.DE vs. 2B7A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CETH.DE nor 2B7A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CETH.DE and 2B7A.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CETH.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CETH.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7A.DE.
CETH.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while 2B7A.DE is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CETH.DE and 0.15% for 2B7A.DE.
Find the right allocation for CETH.DE and 2B7A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer