PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

CETF.AX (VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF) and GDX.AX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CETF.AX is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A50 Net Tax AUD Index, while GDX.AX is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the VanEck Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CETF.AX returned 5.29%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for GDX.AX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CETF.AX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than GDX.AX's -17.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CETF.AX has underperformed GDX.AX with an annualized return of 5.29%, while GDX.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.

CETF.AX

1D
-1.86%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-2.24%
YTD
-0.98%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
5.29%

GDX.AX

1D
-0.71%
1M
-10.41%
6M
-27.13%
YTD
-17.99%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
33.43%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CETF.AX
VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF		-0.98%12.88%30.64%-13.18%-16.50%-1.23%18.52%33.28%-18.45%21.26%
GDX.AX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF		-17.99%143.80%19.59%10.67%-1.08%-8.19%13.31%45.23%-1.28%-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CETF.AX and GDX.AX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2015

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF

VanEck Gold Miners ETF

Return for Risk

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CETF.AX
CETF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CETF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
GDX.AX
GDX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GDX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CETF.AXGDX.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.76
0.77

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.11
1.24

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.95

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.38

2.05

+0.34

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CETF.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the GDX.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CETF.AX and GDX.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CETF.AX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, smaller than the maximum GDX.AX drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETF.AX and GDX.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CETF.AXGDX.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.32%

-45.51%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

-36.27%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-36.27%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

-38.41%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.95%

-45.51%

+4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-36.27%

+24.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.78%

-19.69%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

17.14%

-12.19%

Volatility

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX) is 5.19%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX.AX) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that CETF.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CETF.AXGDX.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

11.80%

-6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

36.98%

-25.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

44.45%

-29.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

32.60%

-12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.06%

33.49%

-13.43%

Dividends

CETF.AX vs. GDX.AX - Dividend Comparison

CETF.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than GDX.AX's 19.79% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CETF.AX
VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF		1.87%1.94%1.55%2.94%2.80%1.80%1.30%1.28%11.56%1.08%1.16%3.19%
GDX.AX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF		19.79%0.48%1.35%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.45%0.55%0.87%0.00%0.39%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

CETF.AX and GDX.AX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CETF.AX is categorized as China Equities, while GDX.AX is Commodity Producers Equities. CETF.AX tracks FTSE China A50 Net Tax AUD Index, while GDX.AX tracks VanEck Gold Miners Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CETF.AX and GDX.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer