CESG.L vs. EEDM.L
CESG.L (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc) and EEDM.L (iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CESG.L is a ESG fund actively managed by First Trust, while EEDM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. CESG.L is actively managed, while EEDM.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CESG.L returned 5.33%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for EEDM.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CESG.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EEDM.L.
Performance
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CESG.L achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than EEDM.L's 17.95% return.
CESG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- —
EEDM.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- 6M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CESG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc | 2.70% | 11.47% | 9.71% | 12.32% | -13.97% | 23.33% |
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 17.95% | 35.48% | 6.70% | 8.18% | -21.69% | -3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CESG.L and EEDM.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CESG.L and EEDM.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
CESG.L
EEDM.L
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc (CESG.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CESG.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.50 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 7.99 | -6.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CESG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.69%, smaller than the maximum EEDM.L drawdown of -40.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CESG.L and EEDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CESG.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.69% | -40.90% | +18.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -13.41% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.31% | -16.97% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.69% | -36.39% | +13.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -9.31% | +7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -16.32% | +10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 4.20% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc (CESG.L) is 3.44%, while iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that CESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CESG.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 9.13% | -5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 19.95% | -11.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 21.88% | -11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 19.46% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 20.79% | -8.26% |
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CESG.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CESG.L vs. EEDM.L - Dividend Comparison
CESG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CESG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.65% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 1.54% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CESG.L and EEDM.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CESG.L.
CESG.L is categorized as ESG, while EEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CESG.L and 0.18% for EEDM.L.
Find the right allocation for CESG.L and EEDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer