CESG.L vs. BLOK.L
CESG.L (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc) and BLOK.L (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CESG.L is a ESG fund actively managed by First Trust, while BLOK.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. CESG.L is actively managed, while BLOK.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CESG.L returned 5.33%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for BLOK.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CESG.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BLOK.L.
Performance
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CESG.L is traded in USD, while BLOK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BLOK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CESG.L achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK.L's 9.97% return.
CESG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK.L
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CESG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc | 2.70% | 11.47% | 9.71% | 12.32% | -13.97% | 23.33% |
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF | 9.97% | 31.58% | 16.58% | 20.82% | -18.71% | 11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CESG.L and BLOK.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CESG.L and BLOK.L has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CESG.L
BLOK.L
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc (CESG.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CESG.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.41 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 8.06 | -6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CESG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.69%, smaller than the maximum BLOK.L drawdown of -44.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CESG.L and BLOK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CESG.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.69% | -44.30% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -9.86% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.31% | -19.23% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.69% | -32.06% | +9.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -3.40% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -13.62% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.95% | +0.46% |
Volatility
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc (CESG.L) is 3.44%, while First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that CESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CESG.L | BLOK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 3.93% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 11.26% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 14.39% | -4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 21.50% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 23.46% | -10.93% |
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CESG.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CESG.L vs. BLOK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CESG.L nor BLOK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CESG.L and BLOK.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLOK.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLOK.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CESG.L.
CESG.L is categorized as ESG, while BLOK.L is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CESG.L and 0.65% for BLOK.L.
Find the right allocation for CESG.L and BLOK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer