CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS
CEMU.AS (iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and WINC.AS (iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMU.AS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while WINC.AS is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by iShares. CEMU.AS is passively managed, while WINC.AS is actively managed. Over the past year, CEMU.AS returned 17.98% vs 21.76% for WINC.AS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMU.AS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WINC.AS.
Performance
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEMU.AS is traded in EUR, while WINC.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WINC.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMU.AS achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than WINC.AS's 9.49% return.
CEMU.AS
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 8.68%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
WINC.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEMU.AS iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 8.68% | 24.42% | 0.51% |
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 10.12% | 7.70% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMU.AS and WINC.AS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CEMU.AS and WINC.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS — Risk / Return Rank
CEMU.AS
WINC.AS
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEMU.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMU.AS | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 5.09 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 17.89 | -11.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMU.AS | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.99 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.18 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMU.AS drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than WINC.AS's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMU.AS and WINC.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMU.AS | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.38% | -18.74% | -19.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -4.26% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.69% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -3.04% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.21% | +1.58% |
Volatility
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEMU.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) at 2.92%. This indicates that CEMU.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMU.AS | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 2.92% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 8.04% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 10.89% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 14.37% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 14.37% | +2.71% |
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMU.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WINC.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMU.AS vs. WINC.AS - Dividend Comparison
CEMU.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CEMU.AS iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.64% | 9.38% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMU.AS and WINC.AS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMU.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMU.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WINC.AS.
CEMU.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while WINC.AS is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEMU.AS and 0.35% for WINC.AS.
Find the right allocation for CEMU.AS and WINC.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer