PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CEMU.AS (iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and IDJG.AS (iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMU.AS returned 10.03%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for IDJG.AS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEMU.AS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IDJG.AS.

Performance

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEMU.AS) and iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMU.AS achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than IDJG.AS's 11.17% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: CEMU.AS at 10.03% and IDJG.AS at 10.03%.

CEMU.AS

1D
0.60%
1M
4.75%
YTD
8.68%
6M
10.69%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
10.03%

IDJG.AS

1D
0.46%
1M
7.49%
YTD
11.17%
6M
11.08%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMU.AS
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		8.68%24.42%10.08%18.65%-11.71%23.11%-0.54%25.09%-11.82%12.65%
IDJG.AS
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF		11.17%10.86%10.46%20.59%-17.31%26.89%6.04%34.28%-10.77%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMU.AS and IDJG.AS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.91

The correlation between CEMU.AS and IDJG.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF

Often compared with CEMU.AS:
CEMU.AS vs. WPEA.PACEMU.AS vs. UB06.LCEMU.AS vs. UB12.LCEMU.AS vs. QQQMCEMU.AS vs. DTLA.LCEMU.AS vs. CSPX.ASCEMU.AS vs. QQQ
Often compared with IDJG.AS:
IDJG.AS vs. EUEA.ASIDJG.AS vs. VOOIDJG.AS vs. SPYIDJG.AS vs. VUAA.DEIDJG.AS vs. DJMC.ASIDJG.AS vs. DJSC.ASIDJG.AS vs. ICHN.AS

Return for Risk

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CEMU.AS
CEMU.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CEMU.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMU.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMU.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMU.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMU.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS
IDJG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IDJG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEMU.AS) and iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CEMU.ASIDJG.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.23
0.76

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.86
1.28

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.12

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

3.68

+2.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMU.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the IDJG.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMU.AS and IDJG.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CEMU.ASIDJG.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.76

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.44

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.37

+0.12

Drawdowns

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMU.AS drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum IDJG.AS drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMU.AS and IDJG.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CEMU.ASIDJG.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-56.97%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-12.76%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-20.09%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-28.00%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.38%

-34.50%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-11.36%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.88%

-1.09%

Volatility

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEMU.AS) is 4.60%, while iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that CEMU.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDJG.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CEMU.ASIDJG.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.33%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

15.62%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

18.67%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

19.60%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.79%

-1.71%

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMU.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IDJG.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEMU.AS vs. IDJG.AS - Dividend Comparison

CEMU.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDJG.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMU.AS
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDJG.AS
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF		1.08%1.04%0.97%0.94%1.00%0.55%0.99%1.39%1.55%1.57%1.80%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.93, CEMU.AS and IDJG.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEMU.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMU.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDJG.AS.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEMU.AS and 0.40% for IDJG.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMU.AS and IDJG.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer