CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE
CEMS.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) and MIVA.DE (Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - CEMS.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value while MIVA.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMS.DE returned 10.71%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for MIVA.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MIVA.DE.
Performance
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMS.DE achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than MIVA.DE's 5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMS.DE has outperformed MIVA.DE with an annualized return of 10.71%, while MIVA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.51% annualized return.
CEMS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
MIVA.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 13.72% | 35.97% | 9.93% | 13.90% | -4.54% | 26.62% | -8.86% | 23.48% | -14.04% | 10.16% |
MIVA.DE Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 5.31% | 12.05% | 11.43% | 10.68% | -13.34% | 21.25% | -4.14% | 24.17% | -4.44% | 9.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMS.DE and MIVA.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CEMS.DE and MIVA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMS.DE
MIVA.DE
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C) (MIVA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMS.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.11 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 0.75 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 1.96 | +10.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMS.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 0.60 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.65 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than MIVA.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMS.DE and MIVA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMS.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.20% | -30.57% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -6.94% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -11.02% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.55% | -19.69% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | -30.57% | -9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -3.21% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -5.64% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.67% | -0.01% |
Volatility
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF EUR (C) (MIVA.DE) at 3.14%. This indicates that CEMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMS.DE | MIVA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 3.14% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 7.19% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 8.76% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 10.96% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 12.34% | +5.09% |
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVA.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMS.DE vs. MIVA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMS.DE nor MIVA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMS.DE and MIVA.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIVA.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIVA.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value, while MIVA.DE tracks MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMS.DE and 0.23% for MIVA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMS.DE and MIVA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer