CEMR.DE vs. VOLT
CEMR.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMR.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while VOLT is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tema. CEMR.DE is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, CEMR.DE returned 21.56% vs 62.14% for VOLT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMR.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.
Performance
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEMR.DE is traded in EUR, while VOLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOLT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMR.DE achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 38.42% return.
CEMR.DE
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
VOLT
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 38.42%
- 6M
- 37.03%
- 1Y
- 62.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEMR.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 9.13% | 27.25% | -2.14% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 38.42% | 10.98% | -7.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMR.DE and VOLT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank
CEMR.DE
VOLT
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEMR.DE | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.50 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 6.12 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 18.90 | -12.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.80%, which is greater than VOLT's maximum drawdown of -27.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMR.DE and VOLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMR.DE | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.80% | -27.19% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -10.00% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -3.28% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -7.17% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.23% | -0.12% |
Volatility
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) is 4.79%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that CEMR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMR.DE | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 8.76% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.87% | 17.10% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 20.55% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 24.63% | -8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 24.63% | -8.15% |
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEMR.DE vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison
CEMR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CEMR.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMR.DE and VOLT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEMR.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEMR.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.
CEMR.DE is categorized as Momentum, while VOLT is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMR.DE and 0.75% for VOLT.
Find the right allocation for CEMR.DE and VOLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer