CEMIX vs. MNTRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CEMIX (Causeway Emerging Markets Fund) and MNTRX (Allspring Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - CEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Causeway, while MNTRX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, CEMIX returned 12.36%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for MNTRX. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. CEMIX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for MNTRX.

Performance

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMIX achieves a 36.68% return, which is significantly higher than MNTRX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMIX has outperformed MNTRX with an annualized return of 12.36%, while MNTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return.

CEMIX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 10.77%
• YTD: 36.68%
• 6M: 41.26%
• 1Y: 71.52%
• 3Y*: 32.96%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

MNTRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 3.88%
• 5Y*: -0.10%
• 10Y*: 1.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	36.68%	36.22%	14.90%	17.13%	-23.05%	-0.83%	16.95%	16.73%	-17.91%	39.79%
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund	0.29%	7.16%	1.38%	5.37%	-13.82%	-2.10%	8.51%	8.18%	-0.57%	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMIX and MNTRX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007	-0.13

The correlation between CEMIX and MNTRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CEMIX vs. MNTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMIX

CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MNTRX

MNTRX Risk / Return Rank: 21
MNTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
MNTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MNTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MNTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MNTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEMIX	MNTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	1.33	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	1.98	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.24	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.31	1.72	+3.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.17	5.28	+15.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the MNTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMIX and MNTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEMIX	MNTRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	1.33	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	-0.02	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.29	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.92	-0.59

Drawdowns

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, which is greater than MNTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMIX and MNTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEMIX	MNTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.90%	-19.36%	-49.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.61%	-3.06%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.92%	-6.27%	-11.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.56%	-18.91%	-17.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.59%	-19.36%	-20.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.14%	+3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.79%	-2.46%	-13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	1.00%	+2.40%

Volatility

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Volatility Comparison

Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) at 1.38%. This indicates that CEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEMIX	MNTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.26%	1.38%	+6.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.06%	2.89%	+14.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.04%	3.98%	+16.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	6.04%	+11.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	4.96%	+13.44%

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MNTRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEMIX vs. MNTRX - Dividend Comparison

CEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than MNTRX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	1.83%	2.49%	3.73%	4.85%	4.87%	23.35%	1.36%	2.03%	2.01%	1.58%	1.55%	1.69%
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund	4.06%	4.07%	4.13%	3.19%	1.85%	1.75%	6.35%	2.46%	2.33%	1.74%	1.97%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEMIX and MNTRX in my portfolio?

CEMIX and MNTRX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEMIX or MNTRX?

CEMIX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to MNTRX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEMIX dropped -68.90% vs MNTRX's -19.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.