CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE).
CEMF.DE and EUNA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024. EUNA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. Both CEMF.DE and EUNA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.01% | 2.59% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -1.00% | 1.44% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEMF.DE having a -1.01% return and EUNA.DE slightly higher at -1.00%.
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 1.05%
- 3Y*
- 1.90%
- 5Y*
- -1.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEMF.DE and EUNA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMF.DE
EUNA.DE
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMF.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.07 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMF.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMF.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.14%, smaller than the maximum EUNA.DE drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMF.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -17.79% | +14.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -9.15% | +6.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -6.72% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility
CEMF.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMF.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.42% | 3.57% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 4.57% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 4.27% | +0.15% |