CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L
CEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD Acc) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Asia Index Net, while FLXK.L is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEMA.L returned 6.62%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for FLXK.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.
Performance
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMA.L achieves a 17.91% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 71.91% return.
CEMA.L
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -10.74%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 33.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
FLXK.L
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- -22.39%
- 6M
- 50.11%
- YTD
- 71.91%
- 1Y
- 137.12%
- 3Y*
- 38.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMA.L iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD Acc | 17.91% | 33.97% | 12.43% | 6.65% | -21.47% | -5.32% | 28.23% | 13.49% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 71.91% | 94.79% | -21.63% | 20.77% | -28.01% | -6.85% | 47.31% | 13.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMA.L and FLXK.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CEMA.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEMA.L
FLXK.L
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEMA.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEMA.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 5.32 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 17.39 | -9.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMA.L and FLXK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMA.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -49.43% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -25.64% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -28.54% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.51% | -47.00% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.95% | -25.64% | +12.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -20.23% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 7.86% | -3.40% |
Volatility
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEMA.L) is 10.09%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 18.88%. This indicates that CEMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMA.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 18.88% | -8.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | 41.57% | -19.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.94% | 45.12% | -21.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 29.63% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 29.60% | -9.43% |
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMA.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMA.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMA.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEMA.L.
CEMA.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLXK.L is South Korea Equities. CEMA.L tracks MSCI EM Asia Index Net, while FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CEMA.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.
Find the right allocation for CEMA.L and FLXK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer