CEFD vs. TERG
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG).
CEFD and TERG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEFD is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. TERG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025.
Performance
CEFD vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEFD vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | -5.27% | 3.14% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 102.79% | 28.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFD achieves a -5.27% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 102.79% return.
CEFD
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -5.27%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- 14.40%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- 102.79%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEFD vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEFD vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
CEFD
TERG
CEFD vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 10.56 | -10.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFD and TERG is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEFD vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
CEFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.09%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 16.09% | 14.88% | 13.90% | 14.76% | 16.56% | 10.31% | 5.37% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEFD vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFD drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, smaller than the maximum TERG drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFD and TERG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -39.32% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.80% | -30.58% | +21.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -9.77% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | — | — |
Volatility
CEFD vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEFD | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 124.59% | -103.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 124.59% | -106.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 124.59% | -107.19% |