PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CEBT.DE
iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc
12.25%73.56%-5.48%7.42%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
-7.62%9.99%46.12%12.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEBT.DE achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than QDVE.DE's -7.62% return.


CEBT.DE

1D
5.08%
1M
-11.46%
YTD
12.25%
6M
40.02%
1Y
97.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVE.DE

1D
3.14%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-7.62%
6M
-5.67%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
18.14%
10Y*
22.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBT.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBT.DE
CEBT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CEBT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEBT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEBT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CEBT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEBT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEBT.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

0.83

+1.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

1.27

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.17

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

1.31

+3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.55

3.56

+13.99

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEBT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEBT.DE and QDVE.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEBT.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

0.83

+1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.93

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between CEBT.DE and QDVE.DE is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEBT.DE nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBT.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.60%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBT.DE and QDVE.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CEBT.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.60%

-31.45%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.07%

-15.59%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

-12.90%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-5.86%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

5.73%

-0.06%

Volatility

CEBT.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Essential Metals Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (CEBT.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) at 5.53%. This indicates that CEBT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CEBT.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

5.53%

+8.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.95%

15.21%

+12.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.49%

25.04%

+9.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.45%

22.52%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.45%

21.66%

+7.79%