CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CEBP.DE (iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)) and H4ZZ.DE (HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - CEBP.DE tracks the MSCI EMU 100% Hedged to USD Index while H4ZZ.DE tracks the EURO STOXX 50. Both are passively managed. CEBP.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZZ.DE.

Performance

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBP.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CEBP.DE

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 8.97%
• YTD: 14.84%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 12.11%

H4ZZ.DE

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CEBP.DE iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)	-0.77%
H4ZZ.DE HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.13%

Return for Risk

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBP.DE

CEBP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
CEBP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CEBP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CEBP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CEBP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CEBP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

H4ZZ.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBP.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEBP.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.40	—	—

Drawdowns

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBP.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.05%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBP.DE and H4ZZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEBP.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.05%	0.00%	-38.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	0.00%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.56%	0.00%	-6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CEBP.DE	H4ZZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.17%	—	—

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBP.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEBP.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEBP.DE nor H4ZZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CEBP.DE or H4ZZ.DE?

On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEBP.DE or H4ZZ.DE?

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CEBP.DE.

What is the main difference between CEBP.DE and H4ZZ.DE?

CEBP.DE tracks MSCI EMU 100% Hedged to USD Index, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CEBP.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.