PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBP.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEBP.DE achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than EHF1.DE's 10.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBP.DE has outperformed EHF1.DE with an annualized return of 13.04%, while EHF1.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.


CEBP.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
6.87%
6M
17.26%
YTD
18.33%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
13.04%

EHF1.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.80%
6M
9.85%
YTD
10.60%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEBP.DE
iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)
18.33%12.28%17.61%17.66%-3.75%33.16%-8.03%34.07%-6.38%1.04%
EHF1.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR
10.60%19.17%9.83%14.12%1.04%18.25%-9.78%27.00%-5.56%4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CEBP.DE and EHF1.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2015

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between CEBP.DE and EHF1.DE has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBP.DE
CEBP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CEBP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEBP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEBP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CEBP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEBP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EHF1.DE
EHF1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EHF1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBP.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEBP.DEEHF1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.17

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

8.79

+4.51

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEBP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the EHF1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEBP.DE and EHF1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBP.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.05%, roughly equal to the maximum EHF1.DE drawdown of -38.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBP.DE and EHF1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEBP.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.05%

-38.13%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-6.24%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-12.89%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-15.64%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.05%

-38.13%

+0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-4.94%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.26%

0.00%

Volatility

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBP.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEBP.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.17%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

8.44%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

10.35%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

12.32%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

14.64%

+2.55%

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBP.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EHF1.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEBP.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEBP.DE nor EHF1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEBP.DE and EHF1.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EHF1.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EHF1.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CEBP.DE.

CEBP.DE tracks MSCI EMU 100% Hedged to USD Index, while EHF1.DE tracks MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CEBP.DE and 0.23% for EHF1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEBP.DE and EHF1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer