PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term € Corp UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (CEBD.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEBD.DE achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than PRAP.DE's 3.31% return.


CEBD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
6M
0.83%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRAP.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.93%
6M
3.54%
YTD
3.31%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CEBD.DE
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term € Corp UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.83%3.09%3.56%3.14%
PRAP.DE
Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
3.31%-3.96%7.69%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CEBD.DE and PRAP.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2023

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEBD.DE
CEBD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CEBD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEBD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEBD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CEBD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEBD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAP.DE
PRAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term € Corp UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (CEBD.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEBD.DEPRAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.95

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

5.14

-3.91

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEBD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEBD.DE and PRAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEBD.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum PRAP.DE drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBD.DE and PRAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEBD.DEPRAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-18.71%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.47%

-3.62%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-5.56%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-10.15%

+9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.38%

+0.18%

Volatility

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term € Corp UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (CEBD.DE) is 0.97%, while Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that CEBD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEBD.DEPRAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

1.73%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

4.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

6.18%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.35%

8.34%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

9.57%

-4.22%

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEBD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAP.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEBD.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEBD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while PRAP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CEBD.DE
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term € Corp UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.89%3.05%3.48%0.14%
PRAP.DE
Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEBD.DE and PRAP.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CEBD.DE.

CEBD.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI December 2027 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index, while PRAP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Liquid Issuer Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEBD.DE and 0.07% for PRAP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEBD.DE and PRAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer