CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE
CEB0.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) and XQUE.DE (Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - CEB0.DE tracks the Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index while XQUE.DE tracks the iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CEB0.DE returned 1.59% vs 4.89% for XQUE.DE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEB0.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XQUE.DE.
Performance
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEB0.DE achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than XQUE.DE's -0.31% return.
CEB0.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 1.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQUE.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- -2.64%
- 10Y*
- —
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.63% | 0.43% | 6.89% |
XQUE.DE Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -0.31% | 8.00% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEB0.DE and XQUE.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEB0.DE
XQUE.DE
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (XQUE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEB0.DE | XQUE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.10 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 3.42 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEB0.DE | XQUE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.03 | -0.11 | +2.14 |
Drawdowns
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEB0.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum XQUE.DE drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEB0.DE and XQUE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEB0.DE | XQUE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -29.15% | +27.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.11% | -4.41% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -15.48% | +15.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -11.68% | +11.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 1.43% | -0.91% |
Volatility
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) is 1.02%, while Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (XQUE.DE) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that CEB0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQUE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEB0.DE | XQUE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.67% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 4.08% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68% | 5.07% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 8.36% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 9.00% | -6.97% |
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEB0.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XQUE.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEB0.DE vs. XQUE.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEB0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than XQUE.DE's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.81% | 1.84% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQUE.DE Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | 3.79% | 4.16% | 4.20% | 3.82% | 7.06% | 3.21% | 9.32% | 3.88% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEB0.DE and XQUE.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEB0.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEB0.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XQUE.DE.
CEB0.DE tracks Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while XQUE.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CEB0.DE and 0.50% for XQUE.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEB0.DE and XQUE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer