CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE).
CEB0.DE and FRCK.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEB0.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. It was launched on Apr 4, 2024. FRCK.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both CEB0.DE and FRCK.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 0.57% | 0.43% | 6.89% |
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -1.56% | 12.81% | 4.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEB0.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than FRCK.DE's -1.56% return.
CEB0.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 1.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEB0.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCK.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEB0.DE
FRCK.DE
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEB0.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.89 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.83 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 8.27 | -5.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEB0.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 0.14 | +1.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEB0.DE and FRCK.DE is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEB0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while FRCK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.83% | 1.84% | 1.43% |
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEB0.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum FRCK.DE drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEB0.DE and FRCK.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEB0.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -32.71% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.11% | -5.58% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -4.12% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -8.87% | +8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 1.07% | -0.55% |
Volatility
CEB0.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) is 0.55%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that CEB0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEB0.DE | FRCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 2.64% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.02% | 3.58% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 6.63% | -5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 8.95% | -6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 9.30% | -7.34% |