PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE31.L vs. IGLS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) and iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CE31.L is traded in GBp, while IGLS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGLS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE31.L achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than IGLS.L's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CE31.L has outperformed IGLS.L with an annualized return of 1.34%, while IGLS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.89% annualized return.


CE31.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
-0.65%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
1.34%

IGLS.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
0.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.69%7.55%-1.61%1.46%1.17%-7.40%5.40%-4.80%0.64%3.54%
IGLS.L
iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
0.26%5.26%2.65%4.19%-4.45%-1.68%1.49%1.05%0.13%-0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CE31.L and IGLS.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2013

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE31.L
CE31.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CE31.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE31.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE31.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CE31.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE31.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLS.L
IGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) and iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE31.LIGLS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.59

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

5.45

-2.32

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE31.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the IGLS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE31.L and IGLS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CE31.LIGLS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.56

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.49

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.41

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.69

-0.61

Drawdowns

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE31.L drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, which is greater than IGLS.L's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE31.L and IGLS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CE31.LIGLS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-9.54%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-1.95%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.05%

-1.95%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.98%

-8.85%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.14%

-9.54%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-0.65%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-1.10%

-6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.57%

+0.60%

Volatility

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L) at 0.77%. This indicates that CE31.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CE31.LIGLS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

0.77%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

1.75%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

1.99%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

2.67%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.07%

2.18%

+4.89%

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CE31.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLS.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CE31.L vs. IGLS.L - Dividend Comparison

CE31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLS.L
iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
3.99%3.88%3.67%1.62%0.30%0.25%0.53%0.46%0.33%0.53%0.88%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


CE31.L and IGLS.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE31.L.

CE31.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while IGLS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE31.L and 0.07% for IGLS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CE31.L and IGLS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer