CE31.L vs. GLTP.L
CE31.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) and GLTP.L (Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist) are both European Government Bonds funds - CE31.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR while GLTP.L tracks the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CE31.L returned 0.96%/yr vs -4.79%/yr for GLTP.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CE31.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for GLTP.L.
Performance
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE31.L achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than GLTP.L's -1.34% return.
CE31.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
GLTP.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.16%
- 5Y*
- -4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE31.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.69% | 7.55% | -1.61% | 1.46% | 1.17% | -7.40% | 5.40% | -2.33% |
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist | -1.34% | 5.35% | -4.39% | 3.50% | -24.95% | -5.40% | 8.70% | 3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CE31.L and GLTP.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CE31.L
GLTP.L
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) and Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CE31.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.06 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 0.35 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.13 | 0.94 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CE31.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.31 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | -0.45 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.26 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE31.L drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum GLTP.L drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE31.L and GLTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE31.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.33% | -37.02% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -5.69% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.05% | -7.66% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.98% | -34.89% | +28.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -28.38% | +24.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -18.68% | +11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 2.15% | -0.98% |
Volatility
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) is 1.27%, while Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist (GLTP.L) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that CE31.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CE31.L | GLTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 2.85% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 5.22% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 6.51% | -2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 10.58% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 10.25% | -3.18% |
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CE31.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CE31.L vs. GLTP.L - Dividend Comparison
CE31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLTP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE31.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLTP.L Invesco UK Gilts UCITS ETF Dist | 4.50% | 4.39% | 4.33% | 3.24% | 1.62% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CE31.L and GLTP.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLTP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLTP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE31.L.
CE31.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while GLTP.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CE31.L and 0.06% for GLTP.L.
Find the right allocation for CE31.L and GLTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer