PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDZ.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds from iShares - CDZ.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada GR CAD while XIC.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDZ.TO returned 9.44%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for XIC.TO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDZ.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XIC.TO.

Performance

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDZ.TO achieves a 13.46% return, which is significantly higher than XIC.TO's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CDZ.TO has underperformed XIC.TO with an annualized return of 9.44%, while XIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.

CDZ.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.31%
YTD
13.46%
6M
10.74%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
9.44%

XIC.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.59%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.90%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDZ.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF		13.46%13.45%17.86%8.98%-4.43%22.80%-3.27%25.68%-8.84%4.92%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		10.75%31.51%21.48%11.73%-5.82%23.42%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CDZ.TO and XIC.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2006

0.80

The correlation between CDZ.TO and XIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CDZ.TO
XIC.TO

Energy

22.7%
18.1%

Financial Services

17.1%
34.0%

Industrials

14.5%
10.0%

Utilities

9.0%
2.9%

Real Estate

8.9%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
3.7%

Communication Services

7.5%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.3%
17.2%

Technology

2.7%
6.7%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Energy

CDZ.TO
22.7%
XIC.TO
18.1%

Financial Services

CDZ.TO
17.1%
XIC.TO
34.0%

Industrials

CDZ.TO
14.5%
XIC.TO
10.0%

Utilities

CDZ.TO
9.0%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

CDZ.TO
8.9%
XIC.TO
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CDZ.TO
7.6%
XIC.TO
3.7%

Communication Services

CDZ.TO
7.5%
XIC.TO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

CDZ.TO
6.7%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Basic Materials

CDZ.TO
3.3%
XIC.TO
17.2%

Technology

CDZ.TO
2.7%
XIC.TO
6.7%

Healthcare

CDZ.TO

-

XIC.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with CDZ.TO:
CDZ.TO vs. VDY.TOCDZ.TO vs. XDIV.TOCDZ.TO vs. XEI.TOCDZ.TO vs. XDV.TOCDZ.TO vs. XEQT.TOCDZ.TO vs. CUD.TOCDZ.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

Return for Risk

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CDZ.TO
CDZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CDZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CDZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CDZ.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.72
2.76

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.53
3.57

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.50

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

3.76

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.49

17.44

+1.05

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDZ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDZ.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CDZ.TOXIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

2.76

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.12

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.84

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.54

-0.02

Drawdowns

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -48.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDZ.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CDZ.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-48.21%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-9.29%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-12.27%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.15%

-16.24%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.70%

-37.21%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.05%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-7.04%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

2.00%

-0.79%

Volatility

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO) is 1.88%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that CDZ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CDZ.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

3.48%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

10.33%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

12.67%

-4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

13.13%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

14.96%

-0.33%

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDZ.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDZ.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CDZ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than XIC.TO's 2.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDZ.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF		3.07%3.46%3.56%3.71%3.67%2.95%3.70%3.68%4.37%3.43%3.51%3.72%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.02%2.23%2.64%2.95%3.10%2.44%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

CDZ.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CDZ.TO.

CDZ.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for CDZ.TO and 0.06% for XIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDZ.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer