PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CDOT.DE is traded in EUR, while BTIC.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTIC.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDOT.DE achieves a -40.09% return, which is significantly lower than BTIC.DE's -25.63% return.


CDOT.DE

1D
-4.83%
1M
-15.78%
YTD
-40.09%
6M
-53.26%
1Y
-73.47%
3Y*
-39.90%
5Y*
10Y*

BTIC.DE

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.62%
YTD
-25.63%
6M
-30.74%
1Y
-41.55%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CDOT.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP
-40.09%-75.15%-10.53%101.17%-75.42%
BTIC.DE
Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP
-25.63%-26.09%143.52%141.40%-52.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOT.DE and BTIC.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.71

The correlation between CDOT.DE and BTIC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDOT.DE
CDOT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CDOT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BTIC.DE
BTIC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDOT.DEBTIC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-0.83

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

-1.47

-0.02

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDOT.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is comparable to the BTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDOT.DE and BTIC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDOT.DEBTIC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.01

-1.02

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

0.03

-0.63

Drawdowns

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than BTIC.DE's maximum drawdown of -68.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOT.DE and BTIC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDOT.DEBTIC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.66%

-68.94%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.82%

-49.68%

-26.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.64%

-53.62%

-37.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.66%

-52.21%

-42.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.87%

-31.90%

-38.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.28%

28.15%

+21.13%

Volatility

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE) at 10.17%. This indicates that CDOT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTIC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDOT.DEBTIC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

10.17%

+6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.99%

31.94%

+20.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.57%

40.61%

+31.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.58%

50.56%

+27.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.58%

50.56%

+27.02%

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOT.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BTIC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CDOT.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDOT.DE nor BTIC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CDOT.DE and BTIC.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CDOT.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CDOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BTIC.DE.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CDOT.DE and 0.10% for BTIC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDOT.DE and BTIC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer