CDOT.DE vs. ARKD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CDOT.DE (CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP) and ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDOT.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for ARKD.

Performance

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CDOT.DE is traded in EUR, while ARKD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

CDOT.DE

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -15.78%
• YTD: -40.09%
• 6M: -53.26%
• 1Y: -73.47%
• 3Y*: -39.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARKD

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CDOT.DE CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP	-46.54%
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF	0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CDOT.DE and ARKD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDOT.DE

CDOT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1
CDOT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CDOT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CDOT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CDOT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CDOT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDOT.DE	ARKD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDOT.DE	ARKD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	0.08	-0.67

Drawdowns

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than ARKD's maximum drawdown of -13.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDOT.DE and ARKD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDOT.DE	ARKD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.66%	-13.05%	-81.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.66%	-2.40%	-92.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.87%	-6.40%	-64.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CDOT.DE	ARKD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.57%	18.73%	+53.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.58%	18.73%	+58.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.58%	18.73%	+58.85%

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDOT.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKD's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDOT.DE vs. ARKD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDOT.DE nor ARKD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDOT.DE and ARKD in my portfolio?

CDOT.DE and ARKD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CDOT.DE or ARKD?

On fees, CDOT.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDOT.DE or ARKD?

CDOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.

What is the main difference between CDOT.DE and ARKD?

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CDOT.DE and 0.90% for ARKD.